Welcome to Smart Home Forum by FIBARO
Dear Guest,
as you can notice parts of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO is not available for you. You have to register in order to view all content and post in our community. Don't worry! Registration is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to sign up. Become a part of of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO by creating an account.
As a member you can:
- Start new topics and reply to others
- Follow topics and users to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages
- ... and learn a lot about our system!
Regards,
Smart Home Forum by FIBARO Team
Question
lazer 38
Hi,
I am trying to connect to a secure web server, with a self-signed SSL certificate, using the net.HTTPClient() library in a scene.
When I connect to the web server using my web browser, I get a warning telling me that the certificate is not certified by a valid authority, as you may have already seen on such certificate.
In my web browser, I just click on the button to continue anyway. Firefox even allows me to add the certificate to the list of approved certificates. Problem solved
But on HC2, I can't figure how to bypass the warning
Here is the LUA code i use :
Please login or register to see this code.
As you can see,I tried to use the "checkCertificate = false" option, but I doesn't seem to have any effect.
I always get the following message : "sslv3 alert handshake failure"
[DEBUG] 21:05:41: httpClient:request() : Error : sslv3 alert handshake failure
The checkCertificate option seems to exist, as I found it as a string in the compiled binaries into the HC2.
I tried both true and false boolean values, which seems to be accepted by the LUA interpreter, but I doesn't affect result as I would normally expect;
If I try another value, such as a number or a string, I get a LUA Cast error and the script immediately ends. This is a proof that the checkCertificate parameter is used, but apparently with no effect.
Can anyone confirm this strange behavior ?
To Fibaro developers, can you confirm this parameter is correctly implemented ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.