Feedback regarding the HC2

[Quikdav 15]

Hello

I plan to buy the HC2 very soon, but I just wish some user feedback to compare what I use on my ZiBASE with more or less success and complexity. I found information on the Web but some are just below for confirmations:

- There is a concept of virtual device. With Teracom IPX800 or relay type cards, do these devices can be used to reflect the status of the relays for example? I saw that you could read JSON (the ECO DEVICE for example) but what about the XML directly? can you read a XML tag localized to a particular IP ?

- There is an API to query the box rearding the state of sensors but also to launch scenes? is it working well?

- There are geolocation functionality. So is it possible to trigger a script when you get close to home, for example?

- In terms of receiving reliability, does it works well? The configuration seems to be well dimensioned. Does the web interface is quick ? for exemple, my ZiBASE doesn't always receive some events, probably at a time it is overloaded (although I don't have so many scenarios !)

I think that's all. Unless there are things you could blame , do not hesitate...

Thank you in advance

Regards

David

[Shad 4]

Hello,

Welcome in the forum.

1) Don't know

2) Yes, and is working very well

3) Yes you have geolocation and could trigger scene

4) Web interface is very fast.

For me fibaro is a good solution. I never had problem with support.