Jump to content

Welcome to Smart Home Forum by FIBARO

Dear Guest,

 

as you can notice parts of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO is not available for you. You have to register in order to view all content and post in our community. Don't worry! Registration is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to sign up. Become a part of of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO by creating an account.

 

As a member you can:

  •     Start new topics and reply to others
  •     Follow topics and users to get email updates
  •     Get your own profile page and make new friends
  •     Send personal messages
  •     ... and learn a lot about our system!

 

Regards,

Smart Home Forum by FIBARO Team


Recommended Posts

Posted

Did Fibaro forget to add a diffusor for the lux meter?

The readings are not usable. If the sun is shining on the square centimeter where the sensor is pointing at I get 1000 lux otherwise 30 lux.

What's the point then having such a sensor if it doesn't measure "the room"?

How are we suppose to use these?

The Aeotec sensor does it much better.

Posted

My problem is the Fibaro light sensor never showed the correct light level

Please login or register to see this image.

/emoticons/default_icon_sad.gif" alt=":-(" />

Please login or register to see this image.

/emoticons/default_icon_sad.gif" alt=":-(" />

  • Topic Author
  • Posted

    That's why.

    It is too sensitive to bright spots in sight. A good light sensor has a diffusor to avoid this behavior.

    Posted

    Yeah... I bought one for tests recently and realised that light sensor works very strange. Now I understand why.

    It still usable but I thought it should be better

    Please login or register to see this image.

    /emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" srcset="https://forum.fibaro.com/uploads/emoticons/[email protected] 2x" width="20" height="20" />

    Posted

    This has been mentioned before. It has something to do with the design of the Fibaro MS I think. Without having pulled one apart, I would think that the light sensor (which is basically just a photodiode) is positioned in the "pupil" of the sensor to avoid being influenced by the light in the cats eye. This means that the light sensor does not get the same light diffusion as it would if it had been positioned closer to the PIR sensor.

    This is just a guess however, as I've never pulled a Fibaro Motion sensor apart - but it makes sense to do it this way to avoid light polution, but it does give the problem of very localized light measurements. It is quite evident however why the Aeon is more correct if you pull one of those apart as the photodiode is positioned just next to the PIR sensor itself.

    I'm affraid that this is one of those cases where form dictates function. I don't like all the flashing lights anyway, so I'd much rather have a working Lux sensor instead of a disco orb - which is also why I've stuck with the Aeon units.

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...