Jump to content

Welcome to Smart Home Forum by FIBARO

Dear Guest,

 

as you can notice parts of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO is not available for you. You have to register in order to view all content and post in our community. Don't worry! Registration is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to sign up. Become a part of of Smart Home Forum by FIBARO by creating an account.

 

As a member you can:

  •     Start new topics and reply to others
  •     Follow topics and users to get email updates
  •     Get your own profile page and make new friends
  •     Send personal messages
  •     ... and learn a lot about our system!

 

Regards,

Smart Home Forum by FIBARO Team


Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, cag014 said:

Have tried again to run two AOQs... 50 lines each.

No issues, both run as expected. (Including delayed commands)

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

Yes, my two AOQ's are running both well too. But the question is: Have been running SlaveSwitches (coupled to whatever device) in the same time?

  • Topic Author
  • Posted
    1 minute ago, Rover said:

    Yes, my two AOQ's are running both well too. But the question is: Have been running SlaveSwitches (coupled to whatever device) in the same time?

    Will try it... How many SlaveSwitches?

    Posted (edited)
    15 minutes ago, cag014 said:

    Will try it... How many SlaveSwitches?

    (Have a look at the addition in the measurements above).

     

    I have added 1 SlaveSwitch: Response times: 6,2,5,3 seconds,

    Second SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 12,3,27,3,2,3,7 seconds,

    Third SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 6,19,3,7,4,6 seconds,

    Fourth SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 119,32,14,38 seconds. The last is the hardest one (Fibaro dual relay) but the third one is the other half of the double relay).

     

    Other question:

    Is one of the present slaves able to serve a Fibaro smoke sensor?

    Edited by Rover
  • Topic Author
  • Posted
    2 hours ago, Rover said:

    (Have a look at the addition in the measurements above).

     

    I have added 1 SlaveSwitch: Response times: 6,2,5,3 seconds,

    Second SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 12,3,27,3,2,3,7 seconds,

    Third SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 6,19,3,7,4,6 seconds,

    Fourth SlaveSwitch added: Response times: 119,32,14,38 seconds. The last is the hardest one (Fibaro dual relay) but the third one is the other half of the double relay).

     

    Other question:

    Is one of the present slaves able to serve a Fibaro smoke sensor?

    Try Slave Sensor...

    Posted
    18 hours ago, cag014 said:

    Try Slave Sensor...

    Yes, SlaveSensor accepts smokesensor.

    The question is now how a smoke or heat alarm is indicated: 

    state="alarm=breached" is not accepted, state="value=breached" and state="value=true" are both accepted but which one is the right one? or  both?

    Posted

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

    Why is $HC3onLine false?

  • Topic Author
  • Posted (edited)
    13 minutes ago, Rover said:

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

    No idea... it always like that, at least for me.

    That's the value in settings/info

    Edited by cag014
    Posted
    8 minutes ago, cag014 said:

    No idea... it always like that, at least for me.

    That's the value in settings/info

    Internet is online and Fibaro services too, strange!

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

     

  • Topic Author
  • Posted (edited)
    18 minutes ago, Rover said:

    Internet is online and Fibaro services too, strange!

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

    Indeed.. by the way by checking JSON box on hcwebEye, the data will be formatted and shown more convenient.

    Edited by cag014
  • Topic Author
  • Posted

    I have 7 slave devices and both AOQ still running fast.

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

     

    Posted

    With this User Shortcut AOQ2 will not initiate: 

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

     

  • Topic Author
  • Posted
    2 minutes ago, Rover said:

    With this User Shortcut AOQ2 will not initiate: 

    Please login or register to see this spoiler.

    Please post complete shortcut and where and how in use?

  • Topic Author
  • Posted

    Don't see any reason why not.

    Posted

    I'am asking, because when my internet connection was NAT-ed, I couldn't reach my cameras. When I called the internet service to stop the NAT, they started working again.

    Posted
    38 minutes ago, cag014 said:

    Please post complete shortcut and where and how in use?

    A shortcut for recurring text would be nice, like for {"`Pushover`", '+Send_Pushover,json[["&PushoverTitle","&Prio","&PushoverSound","Pipo"]]'} 

    the  part {"`Pushover`", '+Send_Pushover,json[["&PushoverTitle","&Prio","&PushoverSound", is used very often in my code.

    But it looks like a User Shortcut is not a sort of text macro...

  • Topic Author
  • Posted
    Just now, Rover said:

    A shortcut for recurring text would be nice, like for {"`Pushover`", '+Send_Pushover,json[["&PushoverTitle","&Prio","&PushoverSound","Pipo"]]'} 

    the  part {"`Pushover`", '+Send_Pushover,json[["&PushoverTitle","&Prio","&PushoverSound", is used very often in my code.

    But it looks like a User Shortcut is not a sort of text macro...

    Not macro, Lua code

    but I think you can use as follow

    PushStr='json[["&PushoverTitle","&Prio","&PushoverSound",'

    in line use

     

     {"`Pushover`"+Send_Pushover, PushStr..`"Pipo"]]'},

  • Topic Author
  • Posted

    @Rover

    I'm still trying to find out why you have such a huge delays... by using external IP to mine HC2 I see same delays... but working fine on internal IP.

    Will try to figure out why, but what I saw it's happens on command with delays... could you please confirm that this is the case?

    I mean do you have problems only in commands with delay in line?

    Posted
    3 minutes ago, cag014 said:

    @Rover

    I'm still trying to find out why you have such a huge delays... by using external IP to mine HC2 I see same delays... but working fine on internal IP.

    Will try to figure out why, but what I saw it's happens on command with delays... could you please confirm that this is the case?

    I mean do you have problems only in commands with delay in line?

    No, I do not have problems with delay in line.

    BTW at the moment again hugh delays are present and I am searching too.

  • Topic Author
  • Posted
    2 minutes ago, Rover said:

    No, I do not have problems with delay in line.

    BTW at the moment again hugh delays are present and I am searching too.

    So all commands have a huge time response? not only command with delays?

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...