All-in-One Scene: How to do it Better

[Rover 47]

3 minutes ago, cag014 said:

So all commands have a huge time response? not only command with delays?

indeed

[cag014 731]

@Rover

I think I've figured out what's the problem...

try attached

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

Edited October 30, 2020 by cag014

[cag014 731]

May I suggest to reboot hc3 after upgrade...

[gggizmo 6]

4 hours ago, cag014 said:

@Rover

I think I've figured out what's the problem...

try attached

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[QUICKAPP1385]: main.lua:1952: 'end' expected near

 

reverted back to previous version. Looks like entire on init section is missing

Edited October 30, 2020 by gggizmo

[Rover 47]

8 hours ago, cag014 said:

@Rover

I think I've figured out what's the problem...

try attached

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

 

The function QuickApp:onInit() content is absent, I took the one from v6.3 and it runs.

Edited October 30, 2020 by Rover

[Rover 47]

55 minutes ago, Rover said:

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

But the delay is still more than 20 seconds, also after reboot HC3...

 

I want to stop AOQ1, but every time I have pushed the stop button initiation followes and AOQ1 is again online ???

Edited October 30, 2020 by Rover

[cag014 731]

1 hour ago, Rover said:

But the delay is still more than 20 seconds, also after reboot HC3...

 

I want to stop AOQ1, but every time I have pushed the stop button initiation followes and AOQ1 is again online ???

oops..

That's strange ctrl+A doesn't copy last function if it's folded

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[Rover 47]

New measurements with Scenemaster as HC2 Slave and Wallplug switch direct on HC3, AOQ1 and AOQ2  each have 1 jM line:

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

Booting HC3 starts both AOQ's and all slaves, HC3 CPU load again 40%.

Measurements:

• All on (with 3 slave smoke sensors and 4 slave switches on): HC2 CPU load 80%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 155 seconds.
• With 2 slave smoke sensors on: HC2 CPU load 80%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 180 seconds.
• With 1 slave smoke sensors on: HC2 CPU load 80%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 210 seconds.
• With 0 slave smoke sensors on: HC2 CPU load 15%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 39 seconds.
• With 3 slave switches on: HC2 CPU load 15%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 12, 50, 16 seconds.
• With 2 slave switches on: HC2 CPU load 15%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 9, 18 seconds.
• With 1 slave switches on: HC2 CPU load 15%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 9, 4, 4, 4 seconds.
• With 0 slave switches on: HC2 CPU load 15%, HC3 CPU load 40%, response time wall switch 2, 2, 3, 3 seconds.

Conclusion:

• SlaveSensor-v2 with 14 D/W sensors: OK
• SlaveSensor-v2 with 3 smoke sensors: delay
• SlaveSwitch-v2 with 4 relay switches: hugh delay

[gggizmo 6]

6 hours ago, cag014 said:

oops..

That's strange ctrl+A doesn't copy last function if it's folded

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

6.4 version in my system has again a relevant impact on cpu load.

on idle, load is 10% on 6.2 and it's 25-30% on 6.4

reverted back to 6.2

 

Sorry cag014 if i report you just cpu load feedback, but it's the quickest and simplest feedback i can report . I have a lot of work to do these days so i temporary stopped every activity on hc3 ( lua-qa-aoq-alexa integration). I just update and briefly test every new aoq release and report you every small pieces of info i can collect

Edited October 30, 2020 by gggizmo

[Rover 47]

3 minutes ago, gggizmo said:

6.4 version in my system has again a relevant impact on cpu load.

on idle, load is 10% on 6.2 and it's 25-30% on 6.4

I agree that the CPU load is getting higher as times go by...

[Rover 47]

On 10/27/2020 at 3:39 PM, Rover said:

My HC3 CPU load is not a problem (20%). The only problems now are the response times of (HC2-)devices.

So why do you do it yourself on HC2? 

What should be the advantage of splitting?

I still have no idea what the advantage is of splitting AOQ code between two instances of AOQ.

[cag014 731]

5 hours ago, Rover said:

I still have no idea what the advantage is of splitting AOQ code between two instances of AOQ.

Two reasons:

1. More convenient to maintain

2. When you have many lines the delay is bigger, by splitting AOQ it should react faster

[Rover 47]

9 hours ago, cag014 said:

Two reasons:

1. More convenient to maintain

2. When you have many lines the delay is bigger, by splitting AOQ it should react faster

These are clear advantages, cag ?

I am going to split my 137 lines till now in a AOQ1 for lighting and controllers and a AOQ2 for security/alarming features.

Edited November 1, 2020 by Rover

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

Hi @cag014,

 

According to my experiences, I changed back to AOQv5.7, because the CPU load is the most ideal for this version. From 5.7+ the CPU load is rising.

I don't know if somebody else also experiences it.

[cag014 731]

1 hour ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

Hi @cag014,

 

According to my experiences, I changed back to AOQv5.7, because the CPU load is the most ideal for this version. From 5.7+ the CPU load is rising.

I don't know if somebody else also experiences it.

Try that

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[Rover 47]

5 hours ago, Rover said:

These are clear advantages, cag ?

I am going to split my 137 lines till now in a AOQ1 for lighting and controllers and a AOQ2 for security/alarming features.

AOQ1 is now 62 lines and AOQ2 79 lines. But CPU load is going crazy: 

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

 

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

2 hours ago, cag014 said:

Try that

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

 

Nice job. The CPU working normaly.

[Rover 47]

2 hours ago, cag014 said:

Try that

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

Initiation of AOQ1 v6.5: 

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

 

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

46 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

 

Nice job. The CPU working normaly.

Something wrong. The AOQ all the time restarted.

[cag014 731]

3 hours ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

Something wrong. The AOQ all the time restarted.

Restarts ?..

Anyone else has same issue?