All-in-One Scene: How to do it Better

[Sjakie 156]

Here you see HC3,

start at 15.13 and higher CPU 15.14 just running

See also your memory when start its higher when running normal it will be lower

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

3 minutes ago, cag014 said:

Version 5.050.13 ?

 

Yes.

[Rover 47]

3 hours ago, cag014 said:

 

I believe there is an error in Pushover, after print("status =",status.status) there are a lot of printouts that not appear on debug window?

for example

                print("Nachricht gesendet :"..message)  -- this is an error. There is no such parameter message in the code!?  There is settings.message... please go through code and change it at all places.

That's the reason that 7 seconds not good enough... the QA is resets himself and it takes much more than 7 seconds.

By the way in the future to avoid concatenating null values, just use

print ("Nachricht gesendet :",message) in this way you'll see null printed (or blank) and you can identify the error.

(and yes, this is Fibaro bug that error doesn't shown)

You are right again cag ?

With the corrections even 2 seconds in between works!

[Sjakie 156]

Rover good behaviour  off your CPU

In my case

130 devices (80 hue)

7 devices for doorbell

5 Sensor

QA

Scenes

//Sjakie

[Rover 47]

58 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

 

1. Inmediately

2. Yes I have. In AOQ and In Lua too

3. Any QA only the AOQ and my SONY TV.

4. attachement screenshot

5. I have a Nice gate.

 

Please login or register to see this link.

 

 

Where can I see this number of devices?

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

6 minutes ago, Rover said:

Where can I see this number of devices?

 

Settings, 16. Z-Wave.

[cag014 731]

26 minutes ago, Rover said:

You are right again cag ?

With the corrections even 2 seconds in between works!

Great...

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

3 hours ago, cag014 said:

5.050.13 verzió ?

So i deleted the all lines, and the CPU's load was normaly.

If i started loaded back the lines, the CPU's load was higher, but the AOQ's answere time was fast.

For the AOQ don't like somethings, but i don't understand what is it.

If the lines number upped, the CPU load and the AOQ's answere time proportionately upped too.

Edited October 21, 2020 by SmartLifeSystems

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

40 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

So i deleted the all lines, and the CPU's load was normaly.

If i started loaded back the lines, the CPU's load was higher, but the AOQ's answere time was fast.

For the AOQ don't like somethings, but i don't understand what is it.

If the lines number upped, the CPU load and the AOQ's answere time proportionately upped too.

 

So i started again the lines back load.

The timeslot upping my CPU load. $sunsetHour~$sunriseHour. If i delete this code, my CPU load normaly.

See my attachement. When i used the timeslot, the CPU higher, than before, and then after lower, when i delete this code.

 

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[cag014 731]

45 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

So i deleted the all lines, and the CPU's load was normaly.

If i started loaded back the lines, the CPU's load was higher, but the AOQ's answere time was fast.

For the AOQ don't like somethings, but i don't understand what is it.

If the lines number upped, the CPU load and the AOQ's answere time proportionately upped too.

How many lines you have?

You can see that when AOQ started

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

 

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

Just now, cag014 said:

How many lines you have?

You can see that when AOQ started

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

 

Not the lines number is my problem.

[cag014 731]

2 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

 

165. But read my prev message.

 

Not the lines number is my problem.

You said

If the lines number upped, the CPU load and the AOQ's answere time proportionately upped too.

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

5 minutes ago, cag014 said:

You said

If the lines number upped, the CPU load and the AOQ's answere time proportionately upped too.

Yes, but i start again the lines back loading. Line to line. And the first line with timslot code, upping the CPU' load. I use the time slot many time. I think something similar is my problem.

 

Edited October 21, 2020 by SmartLifeSystems

[cag014 731]

Did some tests and don't see any impact from timeSlot.

In addition have tested attached version with 175 lines!

To all - as I suggested before please keep your jM lines optimized (each and every line must be checked for conditions, states and time)

This version has built in optimization....

Let me know how it works

Please login or register to see this attachment.

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

1 hour ago, cag014 said:

Did some tests and don't see any impact from timeSlot.

In addition have tested attached version with 175 lines!

To all - as I suggested before please keep your jM lines optimized (each and every line must be checked for conditions, states and time)

This version has built in optimization....

Let me know how it works

Please login or register to see this attachment.

 

Thank you! What i need see in this version ("This version has built in optimization....")?

The AOQ write something in the debug window?

[cag014 731]

43 minutes ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

 

Thank you! What i need see in this version ("This version has built in optimization....")?

The AOQ write something in the debug window?

Yes, if main loop will take over 4 seconds...

[Rover 47]

3 hours ago, cag014 said:

Did some tests and don't see any impact from timeSlot.

In addition have tested attached version with 175 lines!

To all - as I suggested before please keep your jM lines optimized (each and every line must be checked for conditions, states and time)

This version has built in optimization....

Let me know how it works

Please login or register to see this attachment.

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

Quickly back to version 5.0!

Edited October 21, 2020 by Rover

[SmartLifeSystems 20]

5 minutes ago, Rover said:

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

Why?

[Rover 47]

1 minute ago, SmartLifeSystems said:

Why?

See attached picture. Endless: Variable test not found!

[cag014 731]

52 minutes ago, Rover said:

Please login or register to see this spoiler.

Sorry... one of leftovers of problem debugging.... removed

 

 

Please login or register to see this attachment.

Edited October 21, 2020 by cag014